References (46)


Citations (2)



Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments

Fernando Martel García


April 25, 2013

Attrition is the Achilles' Heel of the randomized experiment: It is fairly common, and it can completely unravel the benefits of randomization. Using the structural language of causal diagrams I demonstrate that attrition is problematic for identification of the average treatment effect (ATE) if -- and only if -- it is a common effect of the treatment and the outcome (or a cause of the outcome other than the treatment). I also demonstrate that whether the ATE is identified and estimable for all units in the experiment, or only for those units with observed outcomes, depends on two d-separation conditions. One of these is testable ex-post under standard experimental assumptions. The other is testable ex-ante so long as adequate measurement protocols are adopted. Missing at Random (MAR) assumptions are neither necessary nor sufficient for identification of the ATE.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: attrition, randomized controlled experiments, field experiments, causal diagrams, directed acyclic graphs, average treatment effect, nonparametric

JEL Classification: C9, C90, C93, C99, C42

Download This Paper

Date posted: April 25, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Martel García, Fernando, Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments (April 25, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2256300 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2256300

Contact Information

Fernando Martel García (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 245
Downloads: 19
References:  46
Citations:  2

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds