Learning, Complementarities, and Asynchronous Use of Technology
35 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2000 Last revised: 16 Jan 2022
Date Written: January 1997
Abstract
This paper deals with processes that require several complementary inputs subject to improvements in quality. If after a quality upgrade one of these inputs requires a period of learning before it can be used effectively, then in general it will pay to purchase the inputs at different dates -- the purchases will be asynchronous. That is so because it is wasteful to tie up funds in the other inputs which will be underutilized until the date learning is over. We provide evidence that technology has been used asynchronously in the automobile industry, in the television broadcasting industry, in electricity supply, and in railways, and we argue that our model helps explain this evidence.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences
-
Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development
By Sharon Novak and Scott Stern
-
How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry
By Sharon Novak and Scott Stern
-
By Susan Helper
-
Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, HR Analytics and Information Technology
By Sinan Aral, Erik Brynjolfsson, ...
-
By Sharon Novak and Birger Wernerfelt
-
Integration and Task Allocation: Evidence from Patient Care
By Guy David, Evan Rawley, ...