Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2256768
 


 



Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity on the Federal Bench: An Examination of Drug Smuggling Cases in the Southern District of California


Caleb E. Mason


Brown White & Osborn LLP

David Bjerk


Claremont Colleges - Claremont McKenna College; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

2013

Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013
Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Research Paper

Abstract:     
In this paper we exploit a unique dataset we collected directly from the arrest narratives filed in "border bust" drug smuggling cases to analyze inter-judge sentencing disparity. The comprehensiveness of our data combined with the specific sentencing laws that apply to drug trafficking allow us to control very precisely for variations in offense conduct, offender characteristics, and criminal history. We develop a new statistical model of sentencing disparity that we believe is more accurate than previous attempts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: sentencing, disparity, discretion, drugs, smuggling, judges


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Mason, Caleb E. and Bjerk, David, Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity on the Federal Bench: An Examination of Drug Smuggling Cases in the Southern District of California (2013). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013; Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics and Finance Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2256768

Contact Information

Caleb E. Mason (Contact Author)
Brown White & Osborn LLP ( email )
333 S. Hope St.
40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
United States
2134062949 (Phone)
2134062949 (Fax)
David Bjerk
Claremont Colleges - Claremont McKenna College ( email )
500 E. Ninth Street
Claremont, CA 91711
United States
IZA Institute of Labor Economics
P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 429
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 303,940