New Forms of Evergreening in Australia: Misleading Advertising, Enantiomers and Data Exclusivity: Apotex v. Servier and Alphapharm v. Lundbeck

(2008) 16 Journal of Law and Medicine 220

13 Pages Posted: 28 Apr 2013

See all articles by Thomas Alured Faunce

Thomas Alured Faunce

Australian National University

Timothy Vines

Civil Liberties Australia; RegNet

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

Two recent decisions of the Federal Court of Australia have provided interesting insights into the ongoing struggle between originator drug manufacturers and the public interest in Australia. In Apotex Pty Ltd (formerly GenRx Pty Ltd) v Les Laboratoires Servier (No 2) [2008] FCA 607 the court held that an advertising campaign by an originator pharmaceutical company, which sought to persuade doctors to issue prescriptions prohibiting substitution of “a-flagged” generics, constituted misleading and deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). The decision of the court in Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (2008) 76 IPR 618; [2008] FCA 559 limits the ability of the manufacturer of a drug based on a purified racemate enantiomer to claim a later registration date on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods and subsequently obtain an extension of its intellectual monopoly privileges as well as an exclusivity period for the data it had submitted to safety regulators. Importantly, this case is one of the first to consider recent allegedly pro- and anti-“evergreening” changes to the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) and Patents Act 1990 (Cth) as impacted by the intellectual property chapter (Ch 17) of the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement.

Keywords: Patents, evergreening, TGA, enantiomer, AUSFTA

Suggested Citation

Faunce, Thomas Alured and Vines, Timothy, New Forms of Evergreening in Australia: Misleading Advertising, Enantiomers and Data Exclusivity: Apotex v. Servier and Alphapharm v. Lundbeck (2008). (2008) 16 Journal of Law and Medicine 220. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2257116

Thomas Alured Faunce (Contact Author)

Australian National University ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia
61 2 61253563 (Phone)

Timothy Vines

Civil Liberties Australia ( email )

PO Box 7438
FISHER ACT 2611, 04043
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.cla.asn.au

RegNet ( email )

Australian National University
Building #8
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
71
Abstract Views
468
rank
324,875
PlumX Metrics