Improving Outcomes for Creditors: Balancing Efficiency with Creditor Protections

Insolvency Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 84-96, 2008

5 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2013

Date Written: June 1, 2008

Abstract

The rationale for the latest changes in corporate insolvency laws was in part to improve outcomes for creditors by strengthening creditor protections and improving the efficiency of the insolvency process. To do so, four key areas were identified: enhancing employee entitlement protections; improving information to creditors; streamlining external administration by removing unnecessary procedural requirements; and introducing a statutory pooling process. It is contended, however, that the attainment of efficiency and strong creditor protections are divergent goals, made more so by the manner of regulating for such goals. The purpose of this article is to highlight, with examples from the latest changes in external administration laws, the divergent nature of both goals; show that the use of mandatory provisions, while achieving creditor protection, may be at the expense of procedural efficiency, depriving the external administrator of flexibility and that to maximise creditors' outcomes requires a continual balancing of the goals of creditor protection and efficiency.

Keywords: PRE2009-Corporations and Associations Law, Business studies, Liquidation, Pensions, Secured transactions, Laws, regulations and rules, Creditor protections, Insolvency

JEL Classification: G33, K22, K23

Suggested Citation

Dickfos, Jennifer, Improving Outcomes for Creditors: Balancing Efficiency with Creditor Protections (June 1, 2008). Insolvency Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 84-96, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2257453

Jennifer Dickfos (Contact Author)

Griffith University ( email )

Gold Coast Campus
Parklands Drive
Southport, 4217
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
254
PlumX Metrics