Designing Islamic Constitutions: Past Trends and Options for a Democratic Future

International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013

University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-18

32 Pages Posted: 2 May 2013 Last revised: 7 Feb 2016

See all articles by Clark B. Lombardi

Clark B. Lombardi

University of Washington School of Law; University of Washington - Henry. M. Jackson School of International Studies

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

In recent years a growing number of countries have adopted constitutional provisions requiring that state law respect Islamic law (sharia). Muslims today are deeply divided, however, about what types of state action are consistent with sharia. Thus, the impact of a "Sharia Guarantee Clause" depends to a large degree on questions of constitutional design -- on who is given the power to interpret and apply the provision and on what procedures that they follow when making their decisions. This article explores the trends that gave rise to SGCs and provides a history of their incorporation into national constitutions. It then surveys a number of the remarkably varied schemes that countries have developed to interpret and enforce their SGC's, and it considers the impact that different schemes have had on society. Building on this background, the article considers what type of SGC enforcement scheme, if any, are likely to permit (and ideally promote) a state to pursue democratic policies. As it notes, SGC's are often found in authoritarian or imperfectly democratic constitutions. Unsurprisingly, the designers of SGC enforcement schemes in non-democratic countries have generally tried to ensure that their SGC will be interpreted and applied in a way that permitted or even promoted non-democratic policies. Nevertheless, we can draw from the experience of these countries some important lessons about the types of SGC enforcement scheme that will allow more democratic states to promote both democratic political participation and rights. At the same time, recent debates have erupted in Western liberal democracies about how best to reconcile rights enforcement with democracy. These debates clarify some issues that aspirational Islamic democracies will face as they try to develop SGC enforcement schemes for a democratic society, and they provide insight into the qualities that an institution must possess if it is to address such issues effectively. A number of Muslim countries are currently debating how best to square a constitutional commitment to respect Islam with parallel commitments to democracy and rights. Acknowledging that these countries will need to tailor their SGC enforcement schemes to very different local conditions, this paper describes some basic design features that effective democratic SGC enforcement schemes are likely to share.

Keywords: Islam, Sharia, Constitution, Constitutional Design, Democracy, Rights, Arab Spring, Comparative Constitutions, Comparative Law

Suggested Citation

Lombardi, Clark B., Designing Islamic Constitutions: Past Trends and Options for a Democratic Future (2013). International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013; University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2258089

Clark B. Lombardi (Contact Author)

University of Washington School of Law ( email )

William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
(206) 543-4939 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.washington.edu/directory/profile.aspx?ID=142

University of Washington - Henry. M. Jackson School of International Studies ( email )

Seattle, WA
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
7,490
rank
722
Abstract Views
13,839
PlumX Metrics