Quotas and Consequences: A Transnational Re-evaluation

Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law, Deborah Hellman and Sophia Moreau, eds., Oxford University Press, 2013

41 Pages Posted: 1 May 2013 Last revised: 25 Jun 2013

See all articles by Julie C. Suk

Julie C. Suk

Fordham University School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Date Written: April 30, 2013

Abstract

Although affirmative action remains constitutionally permitted in the United States, racial quotas have long been rejected as wrongful discrimination. The law’s distinction between morally repugnant quotas and morally permissible affirmative action appears to rest on a conception of discrimination as a failure to respect the moral worth of individuals. This Essay argues that, despite this strong deontological language, the doctrinal line between quotas and affirmative action expresses a concern with the balkanizing consequences of quotas in a democracy. Yet, the rejection of quotas depends on an impoverished account of quotas’ consequences. The prohibition of quotas is best understood as pursuing a consequentialist theory of democratic legitimacy. I then engage in transnational comparisons to suggest that, from the standpoint of democratic legitimacy, the consequences of quotas are more varied and complex than is assumed by U.S. antidiscrimination law. Recent constitutional developments authorizing gender quotas in France and racial quotas in Brazil reveal the belief that quotas will facilitate greater social cohesion rather than balkanization, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of democratic institutions. Ultimately, neither deontological nor consequentialist accounts of discrimination justify the moral rejection of quotas. The Essay concludes by arguing that quota schemes should ultimately be judged based on their consequences for democratic institutions. Quotas -- and discrimination generally -- should be regarded as wrongful only when they corrupt more than they enhance the legitimate functioning of democratic institutions.

Suggested Citation

Suk, Julie C. and Suk, Julie C., Quotas and Consequences: A Transnational Re-evaluation (April 30, 2013). Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law, Deborah Hellman and Sophia Moreau, eds., Oxford University Press, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2258733

Julie C. Suk (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
233
Abstract Views
1,504
Rank
198,821
PlumX Metrics