Compelled Disclosures

Caroline Mala Corbin

University of Miami School of Law

July 7, 2014

65 Alabama Law Review 1277 (2014)

Courts have faced a wave of compelled disclosure cases recently. By government mandate, tobacco manufacturers must include graphic warnings on their cigarette packages, doctors must show and describe ultrasound images of fetuses to women seeking to abort them, and crisis pregnancy centers must disclose that they do not provide contraception or abortion services. Although applying the same compelled speech doctrine to similar issues, appeals courts have reached very different results in challenges to these laws. Drawing from First Amendment theory, this Article first identifies why compelled disclosures undermine free speech values. It then applies those insights to the specific examples above. In doing so, it examines not only compelled text but the new phenomenon of compelled images, particularly compelled images designed to provoke an emotional response. The Article concludes that court decisions often have it backwards: It is mandatory abortion counseling laws that offend free speech principles, not laws requiring cigarette warnings or crisis pregnancy center disclosures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 76

Keywords: First Amendment, free speech, compelled speech, commercial speech, corporations, abortion, ultrasounds, crisis pregnancy centers, tobacco, law and emotion, heuristics

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2013 ; Last revised: July 17, 2014

Suggested Citation

Corbin, Caroline Mala, Compelled Disclosures (July 7, 2014). 65 Alabama Law Review 1277 (2014) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2258742

Contact Information

Caroline Mala Corbin (Contact Author)
University of Miami School of Law ( email )
1311 Miller Drive
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,638
Downloads: 214
Download Rank: 112,592
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper