Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2260942
 


 



Search Bias and the Limits of Antitrust: An Empirical Perspective on Remedies


David A. Hyman


Georgetown University

David J. Franklyn


University of San Francisco School of Law

July 29, 2015

Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LE13-24
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2013-15

Abstract:     
As Google has moved from providing “ten blue links” to “universal search,” controversy has erupted over whether Google is favoring its own specialized search results over competing specialized results offered by other entities. Google’s competitors have complained about “search bias,” and demanded that antitrust enforcers should ensure “search neutrality.” Both the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the European Commission have considered these complaints. The FTC closed its investigation without taking any action, but the European Commission issued a formal statement of objections to Google in April 2015. This study empirically examines the impact of potential design remedies on search bias, including prominent links to rival specialized search services (“architectural remedies”) and clearer labeling of Google’s specialized search results (“labeling remedies”). This study finds that architectural remedies have much greater impact than labeling remedies. User awareness of labeling is low, and even labels far more explicit than those currently employed do not have much impact. Consumers have sticky expectations about how search results are presented, and their click-through behavior tracks those expectations irrespective of how the search results are labeled. However, major architectural changes can have a substantial impact on click-through rates. These findings suggest that the impact of architectural remedies will depend greatly on their design features, while labeling remedies are unlikely to have a significant impact. We explore the implications of these findings for other issues at the interface of Internet and intellectual property (IP) law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: search engine, search bias, Internet, Google

JEL Classification: K19, K21, K23


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2013 ; Last revised: July 30, 2015

Suggested Citation

Hyman, David A. and Franklyn, David J., Search Bias and the Limits of Antitrust: An Empirical Perspective on Remedies (July 29, 2015). Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LE13-24; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2013-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2260942 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2260942

Contact Information

David A. Hyman (Contact Author)
Georgetown University ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
David J. Franklyn
University of San Francisco School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
(415) 422-6229 (Phone)
(415) 422-6433 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.usfca.edu/law/faculty/fulltime/DavidJFranklyn.html

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,023
Downloads: 426
Download Rank: 52,210