Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2262058
 


 



Happiness Institutions


Jennifer Nou


University of Chicago - Law School

May 7, 2013

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 8, 2013

Abstract:     
Subjective well-being, or happiness, measures will not reside in sterile vacuums but rather will thrive within policymaking institutions. This Commentary argues that such measures necessarily implicate issues of deep disagreement that must be resolved by legitimate actors and procedures. Given the current lack of methodological consensus, individual agencies should thus experiment with happiness measures in discrete rulemakings when the available well-being data are robust and could usefully supplement a rule’s cost-benefit analysis. This Commentary was written for Duke Law Journal’s annual administrative law symposium on “A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis”.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: subjective well-being, happiness, cost-benefit analysis, welfare, social cost of carbon

JEL Classification: I30, K20, K23


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Nou, Jennifer, Happiness Institutions (May 7, 2013). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 8, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2262058

Contact Information

Jennifer Nou (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 598
Downloads: 119
Download Rank: 187,176