The Practice: 'Wal-Mart' Notable for Rulings on Evidentiary Issues

Vol. 33 No. 50 Nat'l L.J. Pg. 50 (Aug. 15, 2011)

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 407

4 Pages Posted: 9 May 2013

Date Written: August 15, 2011

Abstract

Commentary and analysis of the Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, with a focus on the Court’s discussion of various evidentiary issues raised during the trial court’s conduct of class certification proceedings. The Wal-Mart litigation, embracing the largest gender-based employment discrimination brought by female Wal-Mart employees against the country’s largest employer, garnered extensive media coverage that largely addressed on the underlying merits of the alleged discrimination claims. However, somewhat overlooked in analysis of the Court’ opinion was the majority’s discussion of evidentiary issues implicated in the class certification decision.

Although the Court’s analysis centered on the failure of the class proponents to satisfy Rule 23(a) threshold commonality requirement, the Court also addressed various issues relating to the offers of proof in support and opposition to the class certification. In particular, the Court addressed the sufficiency of the expert witness testimony of a sociologist proffered by the plaintiffs in support of certification, and opposed by Wal-Mart. Significantly, although the Court did not directly decide the issue, the Court obliquely suggested that Daubert hearings to evaluate the reliability of expert witness testimony might be appropriate at class certification hearings. Hence, the Court left open the question of whether trials courts must exercise their Daubert gatekeeping function as part of class certification proceedings.

In addition, the Court also addressed issues relating to the use of statistical evidence to support a showing of classwide gender discrimination, as well as the use of anecdotal testimony for the same purpose. In both instance, the Court eschewed the type of evidence proffered by the plaintiffs. Therefore, the Court’s various rulings on evidentiary issues implicated in the Wal-Mart class certification may turn out to be as consequential as the Court’s central ruling on Rule 23(a) commonality requirement.

Keywords: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, Rule 23 (a) commonality, class certification, evidentiary issues at class certification, Daubert hearings at class certification

Suggested Citation

Mullenix, Linda S., The Practice: 'Wal-Mart' Notable for Rulings on Evidentiary Issues (August 15, 2011). Vol. 33 No. 50 Nat'l L.J. Pg. 50 (Aug. 15, 2011); U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 407. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2262261

Linda S. Mullenix (Contact Author)

University of Texas School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1375 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
254
PlumX Metrics