Can Good Character Be Made Better? Assessing the Federation of Law Societies’ Proposed Reform of the Good Character Requirement for Law Society Admission

Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice, 2013

41 Pages Posted: 10 May 2013

See all articles by Alice Woolley

Alice Woolley

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: May 9, 2013

Abstract

The Federation of Law Societies has announced that it will be recommending that law societies move from reviewing the “good character” of applicants for law society of admission to focus instead on applicants’ “suitability” for legal practice. This paper considers whether the Federation’s approach would address sufficiently the problems with the good character requirement as currently administered. It argues that while the Federation’s approach would be an improvement, a better approach would be to eliminate character based review of applicants entirely, or to adopt blanket exclusionary rules to prevent, e.g., admission of individuals with significant criminal records. It also argues that any reform of the good character requirement must be coupled with the introduction of proper procedural fairness for applicants. The current process for reviewing applicant character offends fundamental fairness and contributes to incoherent and unjust decisions in individual cases.

Keywords: legal ethics, professional regulation, character

Suggested Citation

Woolley, Alice, Can Good Character Be Made Better? Assessing the Federation of Law Societies’ Proposed Reform of the Good Character Requirement for Law Society Admission (May 9, 2013). Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2262863

Alice Woolley (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
969
Abstract Views
2,348
rank
22,329
PlumX Metrics