The Liquidity Effect and Long-Run Neutrality
66 Pages Posted: 25 May 2006 Last revised: 24 Jul 2022
Date Written: June 1998
Abstract
The propositions that monetary expansion lowers short-term nominal interest rates (the liquidity effect), and that monetary policy does not have long-run real effects (long-run neutrality), are widely accepted, yet to date the empirical evidence for both is mixed. We reconsider both propositions simultaneously in a structural VAR context, using a model of the market for bank reserves due to Bernanke and Mihov (forthcoming). We find little basis for rejecting either the liquidity effect or long-run neutrality. Our results are robust over the space of admissible model parameter values, and to the use of long-run rather than short-run identifying restrictions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ben S. Bernanke and Ilian Mihov
-
Measuring the Effects of Monetary Policy: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) Approach
By Ben S. Bernanke, Jean Boivin, ...
-
Federal Reserve Private Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates
By Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer
-
What Do the Vars Mean?: Measuring the Output Effects of Monetary Policy
-
A New Measure of Monetary Shocks: Derivation and Implications
By Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer
-
Identification and the Liquidity Effect of a Monetary Policy Shock
-
Bayesian Inference in Dynamic Disequilibrium Models: An Application to the Polish Credit Market
By Luc Bauwens and Michel Lubrano
-
Assessing Simple Policy Rules: A View from a Complete Macro Model
By Eric M. Leeper and Tao A. Zha