Pure Patriarchy: Nineteenth-Century Canadian Marriage

Constance B. Backhouse

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section


McGill Law Journal, Vol. 31, 1986, 264-312

The author provides a detailed account of nineteenth-century Canadian views of marriage and divorce. In the first part of the article, the author discusses the conceptions of, and attitudes towards, marriage and how they differed in rhetoric and reality. In the second part, the author examines the legislative and judicial responses to marital breakdown. Through extensive reference to nineteenth-century statutes and case law, the author reveals that whereas the legislatures were prepared to adopt a “companionate model” of marriage (ie: equality between the spouses), the judiciary adhered to a “patriarchal model” which vested authority in the marriage in the husband. In the result, marriage was not the uniquely moral institution claimed by nineteenth-century rhetoric; rather, it served to bolster male supremacy in Canada.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: 1800s, nineteenth, 19th, century, history, historical, marriage, divorce, Canada, Canadian, family law, marital, breakdown, companionate model, patriarchal, patriarchy, husband, wife, rhetoric, equality, spouses

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 11, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Backhouse, Constance B., Pure Patriarchy: Nineteenth-Century Canadian Marriage (1986). McGill Law Journal, Vol. 31, 1986, 264-312. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2263407

Contact Information

Constance B. Backhouse (Contact Author)
University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )
57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 497
Downloads: 79
Download Rank: 235,516