Comparing Capital Mobility Across Provincial and National Borders
18 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2000 Last revised: 8 Aug 2022
Date Written: June 1998
Abstract
The persistence of high savings-investment correlations and home-country bias in portfolio construction at the national level is contrasted with new evidence of savings behaviour in Canadian provinces. We confirm that national borders clearly divert flows of capital to domestic investments, but provincial borders have no such effect. In particular, while there is a significant correlation between national savings and investment, among provinces that effect disappears. We discuss the implications for interpreting the distinction between provincial and national borders.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Roger H. Gordon and A. Lans Bovenberg
-
Capital Mobility in the World Economy: Theory and Measurement
-
Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences
-
International Capital Mobility in History: The Saving-Investment Relationship
-
The International Linkage of Real Interest Rates: the European - U.S. Connection
-
Saving-Investment Correlations: Immobile Capital, Government Policy or Endogenous Behavior?
-
Taxes and the Form of Ownership of Foreign Corporate Equity
By Roger H. Gordon and Joosung Jun