How Many Monies? A Genetic Approach to Finding Optimum Currency Areas
41 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2000 Last revised: 20 Aug 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
How Many Monies? A Genetic Approach to Finding Optimum Currency Areas
Date Written: July 1994
Abstract
Recent moves towards greater monetary integration in Western Europe - and disintegration in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union - have rekindled interest in the theoretical and empirical aspects of optimal currency areas (OCA). In this paper, we examine the marginal benefit of increasing the number of currency unions within a given geographical area. We look at six regions; the United States, Europe, the G7, the CFA zone, the FSU and the world at large. Our results suggest that (i) contiguous monetary unions are typically dominated by non-contiguous unions; (ii) neither Europe nor the United States form an optimum currency area, for both regions the costs of adopting a single currency exceeds estimates of the transaction cost savings; (iii) Germany and the United States will almost never find it to their (economic) advantage to join monetary unions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States
-
Regional Nonadjustment and Fiscal Policy: Lessons for Emu
By Maurice Obstfeld and Giovanni Peri
-
Regional Risksharing and Redistribution in the German Federation
By Ralf Hepp and Jürgen Von Hagen
-
By Tamim Bayoumi and Paul R. Masson
-
Regional Income Redistribution and Risk Sharing How Does Italy Compare in Europe?
-
Monetary Policy in an Emerging European Economic and Monetary Union: Key Issues