The Separation of Politics and Science

7 STAN. J. L. SCI. AND POL’Y 10 (2014).

23 Pages Posted: 17 May 2013 Last revised: 8 Nov 2015

See all articles by Joanna Sax

Joanna Sax

California Western School of Law

Date Written: November 1, 2013

Abstract

This article proposes that scientific inquiry regarding questions of fact should have an autonomous zone that is protected from politics. Although many scholars promote the idea that science is politicized, little empirical data exists to support this conclusion. This article contains an empirical study that demonstrates that the public received inaccurate information in the debate over a highly politicized and controversial area of scientific inquiry, embryonic stem cell research.

This article utilizes the data from the empirical study and public choice theory to explain that there are process defects; this economic model can help explain, but cannot be used to resolve the process defects. Instead, this article articulates reasons why scientific inquiry should have an autonomous zone and that political actors should play a limited role in oversight. This article proposes solutions to balance the roles of elected officials with the expertise of scientists.

Keywords: Empirical, Biomedical Science, Government, Policy, Politics

JEL Classification: A12, C9, H51, H60, I18

Suggested Citation

Sax, Joanna, The Separation of Politics and Science (November 1, 2013). 7 STAN. J. L. SCI. AND POL’Y 10 (2014).. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2265985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2265985

Joanna Sax (Contact Author)

California Western School of Law ( email )

225 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
United States
619-515-1555 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
628
rank
365,153
PlumX Metrics