Much Ado About Two: Reconsidering Retransformation and the Two-Part Model in Health Economics

63 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2000 Last revised: 16 Feb 2025

See all articles by John Mullahy

John Mullahy

University of Wisconsin-Madison - Department of Population Health Sciences; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: March 1998

Abstract

In health economics applications involving outcomes (y) and covariates (x), it is often the case that the central inferential problems of interest involve E[y|x] and its associated partial effects or elasticities. Many such outcomes have two fundamental statistical properties: yò0; and the outcome y=0 is observed with sufficient frequency that the zeros cannot be ignored econometrically. Common approaches to estimation in such instances include Tobit, selection, and two-part models. This paper (1) describes circumstances where the standard two-part model with homoskedastic retransformation will fail to provide consistent inferences about important policy parameters; and (2) demonstrates some alternative approaches that are likely to prove helpful in applications.

Suggested Citation

Mullahy, John, Much Ado About Two: Reconsidering Retransformation and the Two-Part Model in Health Economics (March 1998). NBER Working Paper No. t0228, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=226638

John Mullahy (Contact Author)

University of Wisconsin-Madison - Department of Population Health Sciences ( email )

610 Walnut St
Madison, WI 53726
United States
608-265-5410 (Phone)
608-263-4885 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
608-265-5410 (Phone)
608-263-4885 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
2,518
Rank
801,550
PlumX Metrics