61 Pages Posted: 21 May 2013 Last revised: 23 Jul 2014
The United States Supreme Court has recently recognized new constitutional limitations on the use of life-without-parole (LWOP) sentences for juvenile offenders, but has not clearly indicated whether analogous limitations apply to the sentencing of adults. However, the Court’s treatment of LWOP as a qualitatively different and intrinsically more troubling punishment than any other sentence of incarceration does provide a plausible basis for adults to challenge their LWOP sentences, particularly when they have been imposed for nonviolent offenses or on a mandatory basis. At the same time, the Court’s Eighth Amendment reasoning suggests some reluctance to overturn sentencing practices that are in widespread use or otherwise seem to reflect deliberate, majoritarian decisionmaking. This Essay thus suggests a balancing test of sorts that may help to account for the Court’s varied Eighth Amendment decisions in noncapital cases since 1991. The Essay concludes by considering how this balancing approach might apply to the mandatory LWOP sentence established by 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)(A) for repeat drug offenders.
Keywords: sentencing, Eighth Amendment, life without parole, adult offender
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
O'Hear, Michael M., Not Just Kid Stuff? Extending Graham and Miller to Adults. Missouri Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2013; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 13-14. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267595