Political Instability, Political Weakness and Inflation: An Empirical Analysis
32 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2004 Last revised: 3 Sep 2022
Date Written: May 1991
Abstract
In this paper we analyze empirically the most important implications of two family political economy models of inflation: the "myopic? government approach and the "weak" government approach. In myopic government models inflation is the deliberate outcome of politicians strategic behavior, while in weak government models inflation is the unavoidable result of a political struggle between different factions. In testing the implications of these two models we use a new data set on political developments in 76 countries for the period 1971-1982. Using a number of alternative definitions of the inflation tax we find out that the data supports the implications of the myopic governments models; countries with a more unstable political environment tend to rely more heavily on the inflation tax. There is no evidence in favor of the weak government hypothesis.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Determinants of the Choice between Fixed and Flexible Exchange-Rate Regimes
-
By Robert P. Flood and Peter Isard
-
The Political Economy of Infaliton and Stabilization in Developing Countries
-
Do the Benefits of Fixed Exchange Rates Outweigh Their Costs? The Franc Zone in Africa
By Dani Rodrik and Shantayanan Devarajan
-
Nominal Interest Rate Pegging Under Alternative Expectations Hypotheses
By Joseph Gagnon and Dale W. Henderson
-
Why White, Not Keynes? Inventing the Postwar International Monetary System
-
Deconstructing the Functioning of Political Manipulation of the Economy in Turkey