Community Support for Mayoral Control of Urban School Districts: A Critical Reexamination

44 Education and Urban Society 342-267 (2012)

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-28

26 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2013 Last revised: 29 Jul 2013

See all articles by Francis X. Shen

Francis X. Shen

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law; MGH Center for Law, Brain & Behavior

Date Written: August 1, 2012

Abstract

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has encouraged more mayors to take charge of their urban schools districts. Central to debates over mayoral control is the use of a citywide referendum to legitimize mayoral control. Referenda have been used in Boston (1996), Cleveland (1998), and Detroit (2004). Voters in Boston and Cleveland supported mayoral control, while in Detroit voters chose to return to an elected school board. The results of these votes have been used to argue that mayoral control ensures democratic accountability.

This article, however, challenges the view that citywide referenda alone are an effective means of ensuring accountability for mayoral control. Through new empirical analysis of the referenda results in Boston and Cleveland, the article shows that rather than establish genuine democratic legitimacy, the referenda in fact mask strong class-based, and in Boston race-based opposition to the reform strategy.

Although the available data do not allow for generalization to other municipalities, the implication of this article’s analysis remains clear: Legislatures considering mayoral control would do well to think carefully before adopting a referendum as the only or primary solution to the mayoral control accountability dilemma. A referendum in and of itself is not a satisfactory safeguard to ensure the participation of urban minorities and poor residents in urban education reform discussions.

The article proceeds in several parts. The Literature Review section presents a review of the relevant literatures on mayoral control and issues of urban political representation. The Data and Analytic Framework section discusses the specific hypotheses to be tested, and the data and methodology utilized. The Results section presents the results of the analysis. The Discussion section synthesizes these findings and discusses their implications for the future of urban education policy under the Obama administration.

Keywords: education, urban, mayoral control, mayor, governance, inequality, race, class, school board

Suggested Citation

Shen, Francis X., Community Support for Mayoral Control of Urban School Districts: A Critical Reexamination (August 1, 2012). 44 Education and Urban Society 342-267 (2012), Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-28, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2269812

Francis X. Shen (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

Minneapolis, MN
United States

MGH Center for Law, Brain & Behavior ( email )

55 Fruit Street
Boston, MA 02114
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
1,769
Rank
588,714
PlumX Metrics