Congressional Distributive Politics and State Economic Performance
50 Pages Posted: 1 Aug 2000 Last revised: 28 Apr 2023
Date Written: April 1994
Abstract
This paper tests several theories of the effects of congressional representation on state economic growth. States that were represented by very senior Democratic congressmen grew more quickly during the 1953-1990 period than states that were represented by more junior congressional delegations. We find some, but weaker, evidence that states with a high fraction of their delegation on particularly influential committees also exhibit above-average growth. We also test partisan models of distributive politics by studying the relationship between a state's degree of political competition and its growth rate. Our findings support both nonpartisan and partisan models of congressional distributive politics. In spite of our findings with respect to economic growth, we can not detect any substantively important association between congressional delegation seniority, the degree of state political competition, and the geographic distribution of federal funds. The source of the growth relationships we identify therefore remains an open question.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System
-
Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles
By Kenneth Rogoff and Anne Sibert
-
The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: 1984 Update
By Ray C. Fair
-
Incumbent Behavior: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition
By Timothy J. Besley and Anne Case
-
Political Parties and the Business Cycle in the United States, 1948-1984
-
Estimating Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-Process Models with Cmp
-
Challenger Entry and Voter Learning
By Sanford C. Gordon, Gregory Huber, ...