Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, Forthcoming
25 Pages Posted: 29 May 2013 Last revised: 13 Dec 2013
Date Written: 2013
The Delaware Arbitration Program established a procedure by which businesses can agree to have their disputes heard in an arbitration proceeding before a sitting judge of the state’s highly regarded Chancery Court. The Program arguably offers a veritable trifecta of procedural advantages for commercial parties, including expert adjudication, efficient case management and short cycle time and, above all, a proceeding cloaked in secrecy. It also may enhance the reputation of Delaware as the forum of choice for businesses. But the Program’s ambitious intermingling of public and private forums brings into play the longstanding tug-of-war between the traditional view of court litigation as a public venue for private dispute resolution and the and perception of courts as institutions that represent and are accountable to the public. A constitutional challenge based on third parties’ right of access to court proceedings resulted in a district court ruling that arbitration proceedings heard before sitting judges of the Delaware Chancery Court were “essentially” non-jury civil trials and thus were subject to public access. The case raises legitimate questions about the appropriateness of structuring a program in which sitting judges serve as arbitrators and preside over a procedure that is effectively shielded from public view. It also implicates issues regarding the use of public resources in ostensibly private disputes, and even the way our justice system is funded. This article explores the factors that provided the impetus for the Delaware Arbitration Program and analyzes the arguments and policy considerations for and against the district court’s decision.
Keywords: Arbitration, litigation, trial, confidentiality, privacy, Constitution, public access, right of access, First Amendment, Delaware Chancery Court, Delaware Arbitration Program, nonbinding arbitration, ADR, court-connected ADR, contracts, commercial law, corporate law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Stipanowich, Thomas, In Quest of the Arbitration Trifecta, or Closed Door Litigation?: The Delaware Arbitration Program (2013). Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, Forthcoming; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2271359