Japanese Corporate Governance and the Market for Corporate Information Disclosure: What is the Role of Private Rights Enforcement?

Australian Journal of Corporate Law Volume 27 (2013)

57 Pages Posted: 30 May 2013 Last revised: 11 Jun 2013

Date Written: February 12, 2013

Abstract

Dark side private ordering dominated the market for corporate disclosure in Japan for much of the last century. But from the 1990s, 20 years of corporate and securities law reform has resulted in the gradual transformation of Japanese corporate governance, shifting towards a shareholder model of governance and a growing level of external monitoring of the traditional insider Japanese company. Due to restraints in the public enforcement of disclosure rules, sokaiya face growing competition from the proliferation in shareholder derivative actions and private ordering by the Kabunuishi Onbuzman (Shareholder Ombudsman) and activist media groups like Facta. Independent directors and auditors were added to the market for corporate information in 2010 but their effectiveness is restricted by formal and informal constraints. This article examines the increasingly competitive market for corporate information and disclosure in Japan.

Keywords: corporate law, Japanese law, comparative law

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Nichol, Matthew, Japanese Corporate Governance and the Market for Corporate Information Disclosure: What is the Role of Private Rights Enforcement? (February 12, 2013). Australian Journal of Corporate Law Volume 27 (2013), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2271474

Matthew Nichol (Contact Author)

Monash University ( email )

23 Innovation Walk
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Abstract Views
1,371
Rank
305,003
PlumX Metrics