Ideology, Party and Opinion: Explaining Individual Legislator ACA Implementation Votes in the States

31 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2013 Last revised: 7 Mar 2017

See all articles by Boris Shor

Boris Shor

University of Houston - Department of Political Science

Date Written: February 10, 2017

Abstract

Why do state legislators vote the way they do? Which influence is predominant: ideology, party, or public opinion? The implementation votes surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides a unique setting to examine this question, as they make all three considerations highly salient. State roll call votes on ACA implementation were sometimes polarized and sometimes unexpectedly bipartisan. What accounts for the heterogeneity in individual legislator behavior on bills implementing the ACA at the state level? Using new data on legislator ideology and votes from 2011-2015, I show evidence that legislator ideology was by far the most important predictor of voting on implementation votes, far more so than legislator party or public opinion. Moreover, I show the influence of ideology is heterogenous by issue area and bill.

Keywords: health policy, state legislatures, ideology

Suggested Citation

Shor, Boris, Ideology, Party and Opinion: Explaining Individual Legislator ACA Implementation Votes in the States (February 10, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2271783 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2271783

Boris Shor (Contact Author)

University of Houston - Department of Political Science ( email )

Houston, TX 77204-3011
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
146
rank
188,378
Abstract Views
877
PlumX Metrics