Does Monetary Policy Matter? a New Test in the Spirit of Friedman and Schwartz
59 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2000 Last revised: 11 Aug 2022
Date Written: May 1989
Abstract
This paper uses the historical record to isolate episodes in which there were large monetary disturbances not caused by output fluctuations. It then tests whether these monetary changes have important real effects. The central part of the paper is a study of postwar U.S. monetary history. We identify six episodes in which the Federal Reserve in effect decided to attempt to create a recession to reduce inflation. We find that a shift to anti-inflationary policy led, on average, to a rise in the unemployment rate of two percentage points, and that this effect is highly statistically significant and robust to a variety of changes in specification. We reach three other major conclusions. First, the real effects of these monetary disturbances are highly persistent. Second, the six shocks that we identify account for a considerable fraction of postwar economic fluctuations. And third, evidence from the interwar era also suggests that monetary disturbances have large real effects.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Monetarist Interpretations of the Great Depression: An Evaluation and Critique
By Robert J. Gordon and James A. Wilcox
-
A Tax-Based Test for Nominal Rigidities
By James M. Poterba, Julio J. Rotemberg, ...
-
Was the Disinflation of the Early 1980s Anticipated?
By Jed Devaro and Michael Dotsey
-
Choosing the Federal Reserve Chair: Lessons from History
By Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer
-
The Contribution of a Monetary History of the United States: 1867 to 1960 to Monetary History