Theology, Torture and the United States: Do Abrahamic Religions Have Anything Meaningful to Say?

The Muslim World. Volume 103, Issue 2, pages 223–228, April 2013

8 Pages Posted: 31 May 2013 Last revised: 2 Jun 2013

Mohammad Fadel

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 26, 2013

Abstract

Despite the strong normative commitments of the US legal system to the prohibition of torture, the events of 9/11 and the subsequent declaration of a war on terror quickly made short shrift of this consensus; torture became an acceptable tool of statecraft and even popular culture embraced torture as an acceptable tool to be used in the battle against terrorists. This essay shows that this is not the first time that US practice has deviated in substantial measure from its professed ideals, and argues that Abrahamic religion – by refusing cooptation at the hand of the state – has a particularly important role to play in ensuring that states adhere to their moral commitments, even when it may be convenient not to do so.

Suggested Citation

Fadel, Mohammad, Theology, Torture and the United States: Do Abrahamic Religions Have Anything Meaningful to Say? (April 26, 2013). The Muslim World. Volume 103, Issue 2, pages 223–228, April 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2272230

Mohammad Fadel (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
Rank
183,720
Abstract Views
724