Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection

41 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2000 Last revised: 29 Jul 2022

See all articles by A. Craig Mackinlay

A. Craig Mackinlay

University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School, Finance Department

Lubos Pastor

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 1999

Abstract

Implications of factor-based asset pricing models for estimation of expected returns and for portfolio selection are investigated. In the presence of model mispricing due to a missing risk factor, the mispricing and the residual covariance matrix are linked together. Imposing a strong form of this link leads to expected return estimates that are more precise and more stable over time than unrestricted estimates. Optimal portfolio weights that incorporate the link when no factors are observable are proportional to expected return estimates, effectively using an identity matrix as a covariance matrix. The resulting portfolios perform well both in simulations and in out-of-sample comparisons.

Suggested Citation

MacKinlay, Archie Craig and Pastor, Lubos, Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection (June 1999). NBER Working Paper No. w7162, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=227347

Archie Craig MacKinlay (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School, Finance Department ( email )

The Wharton School
3620 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-5309 (Phone)

Lubos Pastor

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business ( email )

5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-834-4080 (Phone)
773-702-0458 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.ChicagoGSB.edu/fac/lubos.pastor/