Forward and Backward Intergenerational Goods: A Theory of Intergenerational Exchange
36 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2000 Last revised: 18 Jul 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Forward and Backward Intergenerational Goods: A Theory of Intergenerational Exchange
Date Written: February 2000
Abstract
This paper develops a theory of intergenerational exchange for generations that are either selfish or have non-dynastic altruism. The main building blocks of the theory are forward and backward intergenerational goods (FIGs and BIGs) and the relationship between them. A FIG is a transfer from present to future generations, like parental investments in education and the preservation of the environment. A BIG is a transfer from future to present generations, like pay-as -you-go social security or taking care of elderly parents. We show that there is a fundamental difference between BIGs and FIGs. BIGs generating a positive surplus are self-sustainable, but FIGs never are. However, even with selfish generations, optimal investment in future generations can take place if the equilibrium social norm links BIGs and FIGs. The tools developed here can be used to understand a wide class of intergenerational problems, from the political economy of environmental treaties to the economics of seniority institutions. Two applications are developed in the paper: (1) the political economy of intergenerational public expenditures, and (2) investment in children within the family.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Intergenerational State: Education and Pensions
By Michele Boldrin and Ana Montes
-
Laws as Assets: a Possible Solution to the Time Consistency Problem
By Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Torsten Persson, ...
-
Lending with Costly Enforcement of Repayment and Potential Fraud
-
Gerontocracy Revisited: Unilateral Transfer to the Young May Benefit the Middle-Aged
-
Unraveling the Nash Bargaining Theory
By Hak Choi
-
Intergenerational Transfers, Lifetime Welfare and Resource Preservation
-
By Hak Choi
-
Solving the Nash Bargaining Problem
By Hak Choi
-
Some Inefficiency Implication of Generational Politics and Exchange