Putty-Clay and Investment: a Business Cycle Analysis

45 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2000 Last revised: 14 Aug 2022

See all articles by Simon Gilchrist

Simon Gilchrist

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

John C. Williams

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 1998

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with putty-clay technology that incorporates embodied technology, investment irreversibility, and variable capacity utilization. Low short-run capital-labor substitutability native to the putty-clay framework induces the putty-clay effect of a tight link between changes in capacity and movements in employment and output. As a result, persistent shocks to technology or factor prices generate business cycle dynamics absent in standard neoclassical models, including a prolonged lump-shaped response of hours, persistence in output growth, and positive comovement in the forecastable components of output and hours. Capacity constraints result in nonlinear aggregate production function that implies asymmetric responses to large shocks with recessions steeper and deeper than expansions. Minimum distance estimation of a two-sector model that nests putty-clay and neoclassical production technologies supports a significant role for putty-clay capital in explaining business-cycle and medium-run dynamics.

Suggested Citation

Gilchrist, Simon and Williams, John C., Putty-Clay and Investment: a Business Cycle Analysis (November 1998). NBER Working Paper No. w6812, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=227607

Simon Gilchrist (Contact Author)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

John C. Williams

Federal Reserve Bank of New York ( email )

33 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10045
United States