Complex Litigation: Tobacco Light Action Dims

National Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 31, p. 13, April 2008

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 420

5 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2013

Date Written: April 14, 2008

Abstract

Commentary and analysis of the Second Circuit decision in McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co. (2d Cir. April 3, 2008), repudiating district judge Jack Weinstein’s class certification of so-called “light” cigarette smokers. The plaintiffs pursued the class action under civil RICO claims. The Second Circuit’s decision curtailed the utility of using civil racketeering claims as a basis for classwide mass tort relief. The court concluded that the proposed smokers’ class suffered from “an insurmountable deficit of collective legal or factual questions.” The decision also dealt a blow to the possibility of aggregate fluid-damage models for economic harms, often asserted in class litigation. The court held that the fluid recovery approved by Judge Weinstein offended the Rules Enabling Act, as well as the due process clause. This article surveys the history of mass tort litigation pursued against tobacco companies and the evolution of theories of recovery over time.

Keywords: Class action litigation, tobacco litigation, RICO class action litigation, McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co., Castano v. American Tobacco Co., mass tort litigation, Judge Jack Weinstein, light cigarettes

Suggested Citation

Mullenix, Linda S., Complex Litigation: Tobacco Light Action Dims (April 14, 2008). National Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 31, p. 13, April 2008; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 420. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2276501

Linda S. Mullenix (Contact Author)

University of Texas School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1375 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
18
Abstract Views
250
PlumX Metrics