Complex Litigation: The Costs of CAFA

Vol. 29, No. 52, Nat'l L.J. Pg. 13 (Aug. 27, 2007)

5 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2013

Date Written: August 27, 2007


Commentary and analysis discussing the problem of the award of plaintiffs’ costs and fees after a defendant’s an unsuccessful attempt to remove a class action case from state court to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA). CAFA provides for removal of state-based class action so to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1453. If CAFA jurisdiction is not satisfied, the federal court may remand the removed case back to state court. The article discusses the emerging case law in CAFA cases where plaintiffs have sought attorneys’ fees after federal courts have granted remand to state court, especially in cases where the plaintiff believes that the removal was frivolous or vexatious. CAFA does not itself provide for an award of attorney fees; the provision for attorney fees must be found among the general removal provisions. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), or 28 U.S.C. § 1927. In CAFA cases, the Seventh Circuit has announced an “objectively reasonable” standard to attempted CAFA removals.

Keywords: Class Action Fairness Act, CAFA, CAFA removal, award of attorney fees, 28 U.S.C. 1453, improper removal, 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), 28 U.S.C. 1927, frivolous removal

Suggested Citation

Mullenix, Linda S., Complex Litigation: The Costs of CAFA (August 27, 2007). Vol. 29, No. 52, Nat'l L.J. Pg. 13 (Aug. 27, 2007). Available at SSRN:

Linda S. Mullenix (Contact Author)

University of Texas School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1375 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information