Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher's Praxis Story

Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 353-366, 2002.

15 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2013 Last revised: 4 Oct 2013

See all articles by Bent Flyvbjerg

Bent Flyvbjerg

University of Oxford - Said Business School

Date Written: June 1, 2002

Abstract

This article provides an answer to what has been called the biggest problem in theorizing and understanding planning: the ambivalence about power found among planning researchers, theorists, and students. The author narrates how he came to work with issues of power and gives an example of how the methodology he developed for power studies — phronetic planning research — may be employed in practice. Phronetic planning research follows the tradition of power studies running from Machiavelli and Nietzsche to Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu. It focuses on four value-rational questions: (1) Where are we going with planning? (2) Who gains and who loses, and by which mechanisms of power? (3) Is this development desirable? (4) What should be done? These questions are exemplified for a specific instance of Scandinavian urban planning. The author finds that the questions, and their answers, make a difference to planning in practice. They make planning research matter.

Listed as "Most Cited" article on the journal's home page.

Suggested Citation

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher's Praxis Story (June 1, 2002). Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 353-366, 2002. . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278388

Bent Flyvbjerg (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Said Business School ( email )

Park End Street
Oxford, OX1 1HP
Great Britain

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
276
rank
108,231
Abstract Views
1,289
PlumX Metrics