Putting the Dormant Commerce Clause Back to Sleep: Adapting the Doctrine to Support State Renewable Portfolio Standards

70 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2013

See all articles by Daniel Lee

Daniel Lee

Stoel Rives LLP

Tim Duane

University of San Diego School of Law; University of California, Santa Cruz

Date Written: June 12, 2013

Abstract

State renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) and renewable energy standards (RESs) are among the most effective devices for renewable energy development, but plaintiffs have begun to challenge the constitutionality of specific provisions of these statutes by claiming they discriminate against interstate commerce in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause. Recently, a coal interest group has brought a much broader challenge, arguing that Colorado’s RES excessively burdens interstate commerce because it purportedly discriminates against out-of-state nonrenewable energy providers. Should this attack succeed, the constitutionality of state RPSs and RESs across the nation will fall into doubt. At the forefront of these concerns is the ambitious California RPS, which mandates that utilities obtain 33% of energy from renewable sources. Other dormant Commerce Clause challenges to California environmental regulations, including the Rocky Mountain Farmers v. Goldstene litigation concerning the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard, may also influence how courts approach challenges to RPSs. This Article explores the implications that these cases and the Colorado litigation will have for the California RPS and other state RPSs, and analyzes the weaknesses of both the Colorado and California statutes. Finally, it offers a number of defenses that states can use to overcome these attacks.

Keywords: renewable portfolio standards, dormant commerce clause, California RPS, AB 32, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, renewable energy standards

Suggested Citation

Lee, Daniel and Duane, Timothy P., Putting the Dormant Commerce Clause Back to Sleep: Adapting the Doctrine to Support State Renewable Portfolio Standards (June 12, 2013). Environmental Law, Vol. 43, No. 295, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278515

Daniel Lee

Stoel Rives LLP ( email )

600 University Street, Suite 3600
Seattle, WA 98101
United States

Timothy P. Duane (Contact Author)

University of San Diego School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States

University of California, Santa Cruz ( email )

Environmental Studies
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
698
rank
261,628
PlumX Metrics