15 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2013 Last revised: 1 Aug 2014
Date Written: August 1, 2014
We investigate trends in Congressional scrutiny of the US Federal Reserve from the late 1990s through 2012. Though independent, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) is accountable to legislative principals. Our aim is to develop indicators of latent scrutiny from congresspersons’ behavior in committee hearings. These can be used to study the political stressors the Fed is under and how it responds. We use change point analysis to estimate periods of high and low legislative scrutiny from both the US House of Representatives and Senate. Surprisingly, though the Senate has the power to approve Fed appointments, their scrutiny of the Fed does not seem to noticeably change over our observation period. The House Committee on Financial Services did noticeably increase its scrutiny of the Fed during the recent financial crisis. The paper also introduces political scientists to new multivariate change point methods that can estimate latent legislative scrutiny states. These indicators could be used in future research to better understand legislative-bureaucratic relationships.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Gandrud, Christopher and Young, Kevin, Creating Scrutiny Indicators: A Change Point Exploration of Congressional Scrutiny of the US Federal Reserve (August 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2279258 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2279258