Political Science Concept Formation (Part III) - Different Approaches & Different Definitions

27 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2013

See all articles by Jürg Martin Gabriel

Jürg Martin Gabriel

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich - Center for Comparative and International Studies

Date Written: June 17, 2013

Abstract

This is the last of three articles discussing concept formation in our field. The first concentrates on concept formation in general and highlights the role of definitions. The second article is more specific. It deals with David Easton’s well-known definition of politics as “authoritative allocation of values”. In this third and final paper the definitional modes of six different approaches are examined. The question, once again, is how formal aspects of defining combine with substantive images of Homo politicus. There is no simple conclusion, of course, because the examples analysed are highly diverse. They range from “subjectivist” approaches like discursive-constructivism all the way to “objectivist” approaches like empirical naturalism. Small wonder that different combinations of formal and substantive considerations prevail. Typical and atypical, tight and loose, soft and hard attributes combine in various ways. And, as is to be expected, the interrelation with political images varies, too.

Keywords: concepts, definitions, approaches, politics

Suggested Citation

Gabriel, Jurg Martin, Political Science Concept Formation (Part III) - Different Approaches & Different Definitions (June 17, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2280253 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2280253

Jurg Martin Gabriel (Contact Author)

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich - Center for Comparative and International Studies ( email )

ETH-Zentrum - SEI
Zurich, 8092
Switzerland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
810
Rank
442,360
PlumX Metrics