Damages and Rights

From Donal Nolan and Andrew Robertson (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart 2012) 275-307

35 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2013

See all articles by Andrew Burrows

Andrew Burrows

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This essay looks at three topical aspects of the relationship between damages and rights. The first is the substitutive damages thesis which, it is argued, should be rejected. The second are damages under the Human Rights Act 1998. Here the argument is that the Greenfield case should be departed from: the scale of non-pecuniary loss awards in domestic tort law should be applied by analogy to non-pecuniary loss awards for beach of Convention rights by a public authority under the Human Rights Act 1998. The third are vindicatory damages which, it is submitted, have no place, and should have no place, in English tort law.

Keywords: Damages, tort, human rights, vindicatory damages

Suggested Citation

Burrows, Andrew Stephen, Damages and Rights (2012). From Donal Nolan and Andrew Robertson (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart 2012) 275-307, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2280302 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2280302

Andrew Stephen Burrows (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
597
Abstract Views
2,361
rank
50,728
PlumX Metrics