Free Trade and Global Warming: A Trade Theory View of the Kyoto Protocol
54 Pages Posted: 16 May 2000 Last revised: 5 Jun 2022
Date Written: April 2000
Abstract
This paper demonstrates how three important results in environmental economics, true under mild conditions in closed economies, are false or need serious amendment in a world with international trade in goods. Since the three results we highlight have framed much of the ongoing discussion and research on the Kyoto protocol our viewpoint from trade theory suggests a re-examination may be in order. Specifically, we demonstrate that in an open trading world, but not in a closed economy setting: (1) unilateral emission reductions by the rich North can create self-interested emission reductions by the unconstrained poor South; (2) simple rules for allocating emission reductions across countries (such as uniform reductions) may well be efficient even if international trade in emission permits is not allowed; and (3) when international emission permit trade does occur it may make both participants in the trade worse off and increase global emissions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Growth and the Environment
By Gene M. Grossman and Alan B. Krueger
-
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
By Gene M. Grossman and Alan B. Krueger
-
Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?
By Werner Antweiler, Brian R. Copeland, ...
-
The Employers' Cost of Workers' Compensation Insurance: Magnitudes, Determinants, and Public Policy
-
The Effects on Developing Countries of the Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading
By A. Denny Ellerman, Henry D. Jacoby, ...
-
Measurement of Environmental Efficiency and Productivity: A Cross Country Analysis
By Surender Kumar and Madhu Khanna
-
By Onno Kuik and Frans H. Oosterhuis