Criminal Defense after Padilla v. Kentucky

César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández

University of Denver Sturm College of Law


26 Georgetown Immigration Law Review 475 (2012)

The Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky involves criminal defense attorneys in immigration law as never before. Long the mediators between defendants and the state’s penal authority, these attorneys must now advise their noncitizen clients about the potential immigration pitfalls of a conviction. Just what advice is required, however, depends on the clarity of the immigration consequence. This article unpacks Padilla and the jurisprudential convergence of criminal law and immigration law to develop a theoretical framework based on close readings of the Immigration and Nationality Act’s crime-based grounds of removal. Applying this framework suggests that crimes that likely constitute controlled substances offenses or aggravated felonies require clear, unequivocal advice that conviction will lead to deportation, while offenses that might constitute crimes involving moral turpitude require general advice only.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: immigration, criminal law, Sixth Amendment, right to counsel, ineffective assistance of counsel, crimmigration

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 19, 2013  

Suggested Citation

García Hernández, César Cuauhtémoc, Criminal Defense after Padilla v. Kentucky (2012). 26 Georgetown Immigration Law Review 475 (2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2281612

Contact Information

César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández (Contact Author)
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
303-871-6442 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.crImmigration.com

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 975
Downloads: 153
Download Rank: 152,639