Penalties: Reconsidering the 'Reliance on Professional' Defense to Delinquency Penalties in the Age of E-Filing

4 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2013

See all articles by Bryan C. Skarlatos

Bryan C. Skarlatos

Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP; New York University School of Law

Christopher M. Ferguson

Kostelanetz & Fink LLP

Date Written: February 2012

Abstract

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Boyle v. United States, courts traditionally have held that a taxpayer cannot delegate the responsibility to file a tax return to another person and, therefore, cannot avoid a late filing penalty if the other person fails to file on time. However, the IRS now encourages taxpayers to e-file their tax return through e-filing professionals. Under these circumstances, the IRS and courts must re-evaluate whether and when a taxpayer should be penalized if a professional fails to e-file a return on time.

Keywords: penalties, delinquency, late filing, e-filing, Boyle

Suggested Citation

Skarlatos, Bryan C. and Ferguson, Christopher M., Penalties: Reconsidering the 'Reliance on Professional' Defense to Delinquency Penalties in the Age of E-Filing (February 2012). Journal of Tax Practice and Procedure, pp. 9-10 and 68-69, Feb.-March 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2282665

Bryan C. Skarlatos (Contact Author)

Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP ( email )

7 World Trade Center
New York, NY 10007
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.kflaw.com/

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Christopher M. Ferguson

Kostelanetz & Fink LLP ( email )

530 Fifth Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
818
Rank
531,713
PlumX Metrics