Incommensurability: Threat or Tool for Boundary Crossing Research?

18 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2013 Last revised: 30 Aug 2014

See all articles by Mathieu Guillermin

Mathieu Guillermin

Institut Supérieur de Philosophie / Centre de Philosophie du Droit - Université Catholique de Louvain

Florin Popa

European Commission

Tom Dedeurwaerdere

Catholic University of Louvain - Centre for the Philosophy of Law

Date Written: November 12, 2013

Abstract

In this paper, we defend the thesis that, as far as disciplinary boundaries crossing research is concerned, incommensurability can be seen as playing a positive crucial role (instead of being considered in the abstract as negligible or synonymous to full enclosure). Following the post-positivist insights, we assume that incommensurability phenomena are constitutive part of disciplinary boundaries reflecting their thickness and structure. We thus argue that the analysis of how incommensurability phenomena occur and are structured in concrete research settings constitutes a tool susceptible to constitute a measure of the separation between the various frameworks and to contribute determining what kind of specific (interparadigmatic) work should be deployed to ensure the settling of a suitable research mode. Thereby, in this article, we first delineate different meanings provided by Kuhn to the notion of incommensurability and select the relevant one with respect to the perspective of disciplinary boundaries crossing research. Then we show how these selected notions are relevant regarding boundaries crossing research. The relevance of our reading of incommensurability phenomena being established, we then detail how the analysis of these phenomena can play the role of a fruitful tool guiding the specific interparadigmatic work required for the settling of disciplinary boundaries crossing research.

Keywords: interdisciplinarity; incommensurability; paradigm; disciplinary boundaries

Suggested Citation

Guillermin, Mathieu and Popa, Florin and Dedeurwaerdere, Tom, Incommensurability: Threat or Tool for Boundary Crossing Research? (November 12, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2284093 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2284093

Mathieu Guillermin (Contact Author)

Institut Supérieur de Philosophie / Centre de Philosophie du Droit - Université Catholique de Louvain ( email )

Place Montesquieu, 2
Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348
Belgium

Florin Popa

European Commission ( email )

Rue de la Loi 200
Brussels, B-1049
Belgium

Tom Dedeurwaerdere

Catholic University of Louvain - Centre for the Philosophy of Law ( email )

Place Montesquieu, 3
Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348
Belgium

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
501
PlumX Metrics