Is it One Break or Ongoing Permanent Shocks That Explains U.S. Real GDP?
33 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2013
Date Written: May 2013
Abstract
The relative importance of permanent (trend) versus cyclical shocks to GDP has been a central issue in macroeconomics, since the work of Nelson and Plosser (1982) and Morley et al. (2003) found large trend shocks. In contrast, Perron and Wada (2009) argued for a one time change in the mean growth rate in 1973 to be the only trend shock to the postwar U.S. real output. We re-estimate the Perron and Wada (2009) model conditional on a trend break having occurred at any one quarter. We then average the conditional estimates of the trend variance over the probability that the break occurred in a specified quarter. We do this both by an approximate Bayesian model average, in which the conditional estimates are done by maximum likelihood, and the date probabilities are found using the Schwarz (1978) approximation to the Bayesian marginal likelihood, and an exact Bayesian analysis which incorporates break date uncertainty into a trend-cycle decomposition of U.S. real GDP. The weight of the evidence supports the Perron and Wada (2009)’s finding of a fairly small trend variance, but the data does not provide very strong evidence against the alternative.
Keywords: GDP, trend break, difference stationary, trend stationary
JEL Classification: C11, E30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Measuring the NAIRU with Reduced Uncertainty: A Multiple Indicator-Common Component Approach
By Arabinda Basistha and Richard Startz
-
In Search of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
By Thomas B. King and James Morley
-
The Clark Model with Correlated Components
By Kum Hwa Oh and Eric Zivot
-
Trend-Cycle Correlation, Drift Break and the Estimation of Trend and Cycle in Canadian GDP
-
Capacity Utilisation, Constraints and Price Adjustments Under the Microscope
By Sarah M. Lein and Eva M. Kberl
-
Output Fluctuations in the G-7: An Unobserved Components Approach
By Sinchan Mitra and Tara M. Sinclair
-
Testing Stationarity with Unobserved Components Models
By James Morley, Irina Panovska, ...
-
A Review of Cyclical Indicators for the United States: Preliminary Results
-
Demand Variability, Supply Shocks and the Output-Inflation Tradeoff
By Richard T. Froyen and Roger N. Waud