Outsourcing Corporate Governance: Conflicts of Interest and Competition in the Proxy Advisory Industry
60 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2013 Last revised: 26 Dec 2019
Date Written: November 12, 2013
Abstract
Proxy advisors, private firms that help institutional investors decide how to vote their shares, play an extremely powerful role in shaping corporate governance. However, investors and policymakers are concerned about undesirable features of the industry, especially potential conflicts of interest. In this paper, I model how conflicts of interest may arise when a proxy advisor provides services to both investors and corporate issuers on the same governance issues. I then study how increased competition can alleviate these conflicts. Using a unique data set on voting recommendations, I show that the entry of a new advisory firm reduces favorable recommendations for management proposals by the incumbent advisor, which is consistent with our theory as the incumbent is subject to conflicts of interest by serving both investors and corporations. These results shed light on the policy debate on whether and how to regulate the proxy advisory industry.
Keywords: Proxy advisory firms, conflicts of interest, competition
JEL Classification: D43, D82, G34, L15
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence
By Jonathan M. Karpoff, Paul H. Malatesta, ...
-
The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings
-
Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance in the United States
-
Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?
By Kai Li, Jarrad Harford, ...
-
Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance
-
By Tim C. Opler and Jonathan S. Sokobin
-
The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States
By Stuart Gillan and Laura T. Starks