In Search of a Canon: Three Texts on Dispute Resolution

Negotiation Journal Vol. 22, p. 227, April 2006

11 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2013  

Kenneth H. Fox

Hamline University

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

Is the dispute resolution field finding its canon? The recent publication of three similar academic texts in the field suggests a growing consensus around what dispute resolution is and what body of theory underlies it. Publication of these texts also suggests that the study of dispute resolution continues to move more centrally into legal, and other professional, education. Important scholarship, however, remains unexamined, affecting both the maturation of the field and its potential influence on future professionals.

The three texts reviewed in this article include the following:

1. Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice and Law (2005) by Jay Folberg, Dwight Golann, Lisa Kloppenberg, and Thomas Stipanowich (eds.).

2. Dispute Resolution: Beyond the Adversarial Model (2005) by Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow, Lela Porter Love, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, and Jean R. Sternlight (eds.).

3. The Handbook of Dispute Resolution (2005) by Michael L. Moffitt and Robert C. Bordone (eds.).

Keywords: dispute resolution, arbitration, mediation, negotiation, canon, textbook, handbook, review, law school, interdisciplinary, curriculum

JEL Classification: I2, K00, K4, K33, J52, D74

Suggested Citation

Fox, Kenneth H., In Search of a Canon: Three Texts on Dispute Resolution (2006). Negotiation Journal Vol. 22, p. 227, April 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2289527

Kenneth H. Fox (Contact Author)

Hamline University ( email )

1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
6515232411 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.hamline.edu/faculty-staff/ken-fox/

Paper statistics

Downloads
25
Abstract Views
369