A Great Divide between Current and Preferred Practice? Survey Says

The ACICA News, June 2013

1 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2013

See all articles by Kyle D. Dickson-Smith

Kyle D. Dickson-Smith

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; University of Melbourne

Date Written: July 1, 2013

Abstract

The 2012 annual global survey on the practices of international arbitration has been released by White & Case LLP and the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary, University of London. Kyle Dickson-Smith summarises the key findings of the survey and provides an analysis as to the underlying basis of the difference between the current and preferred practices of the stakeholders of international arbitration.

Keywords: 2012 International Arbitration Survey, Arbitral Process, White & Case

Suggested Citation

Dickson-Smith, Kyle D., A Great Divide between Current and Preferred Practice? Survey Says (July 1, 2013). The ACICA News, June 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2290295

Kyle D. Dickson-Smith (Contact Author)

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators ( email )

12 Bloomsbury Square
London, WC1A 2LP
United Kingdom

University of Melbourne ( email )

185 Pelham Street
Carlton, Victoria 3053
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
20
Abstract Views
311
PlumX Metrics