36 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2013 Last revised: 3 May 2016
Date Written: 2005
This Note illustrates how violations of Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (which prohibits litigants from relying on certain propensity proofs) occur routinely. It demonstrates that the ineffectiveness of the ban in the context of discrimination suits cannot be blamed on clever lawyers or negligent judges, but rather is a predictable consequence of the dearth of evidence available to discrimination plaintiffs. This Note concludes by arguing that this subtle but problematic incongruity justifies a reform of the Rule.
Keywords: Evidence law, discrimination law, Rule 404, propensity evidence
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Manheim, Lisa Marshall, The Character of Discrimination Law: The Incompatibility of Rule 404 and Employment Discrimination Suits (2005). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 114, No. 5, p. 1063, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2292110