Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible?

Journal of Applied Finance, Spring/Summer 2013, Volume 23, No. 1

Posted: 16 Jul 2013

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 15, 2013

Abstract

The dozen largest private equity firms are accused of bid- rigging in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market due to the practice of team bidding in groups known as clubs or consortia. The antitrust allegations are implausible, however, because the segments of the M&A market dominated by private equity firms are among the most competitive of all, sale processes are run by disinterested directors who’s permission generally is required before prospective buyers can team up, and the differential average offer premium paid by teams of private equity sponsors is zero.

Keywords: Private Equity, bid-rigging, Mergers and Acquisitions ( M&A), antitrust

Suggested Citation

Comment, Robert, Team Bidding by Private Equity Sponsors: Are the Antitrust Allegations Plausible? (July 15, 2013). Journal of Applied Finance, Spring/Summer 2013, Volume 23, No. 1 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2294069

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
625
PlumX Metrics