The Multiple Domains of Harmonisation: Politics, Policy, Process and Program

(2012) 71(3) Australian Journal of Public Administration, 325-342

35 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2013 Last revised: 3 Oct 2013

See all articles by Eric Windholz

Eric Windholz

Monash University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This article builds a taxonomy of the different functions performed by the term ‘harmonisation’ in contemporary policy debates. Four broad functions or domains of use are identified – political, policy, process and program – within each of which there are multiple different uses. Based on this classification, the article then develops a multi-dimensional conceptual framework through which the term can be better understood and examined, its political uses identified and isolated, and harmonisation initiatives constructed, framed and analysed. The framework should prove useful for Ministers and government departments called upon to determine if, how and to what extent to harmonise regulations in a particular area; regulators called upon to administer and enforce harmonised regulatory regimes; and regulatees, practitioners and academics concerned to understand the impact of a harmonisation task.

Keywords: harmonisation, regulation, policy, politics, framework

JEL Classification: H11, F15, H77, G20

Suggested Citation

Windholz, Eric, The Multiple Domains of Harmonisation: Politics, Policy, Process and Program (2012). (2012) 71(3) Australian Journal of Public Administration, 325-342, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2294191

Eric Windholz (Contact Author)

Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
331
rank
364,257
PlumX Metrics