Ambiguity Aversion in Ellsberg Frameworks
44 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2013 Last revised: 28 Oct 2015
Date Written: October 27, 2015
Abstract
We study optimal portfolio choice and equilibrium asset prices induced by alpha-maxmin expected utility (alpha-MEU) models. In the standard Ellsberg framework we prove that alpha-MEU preferences are equivalent to either maxmin, maxmax or subjective expected utility (SEU). We show how ambiguity aversion impacts equilibrium asset prices, and revisit the laboratory experimental findings in Bossaerts, Ghirardato, Guarnaschelli, and Zame (2010). Only when there are three or more ambiguous states the alpha-MEU, maxmin, maxmax and SEU models induce different portfolio choices. We suggest criteria to discriminate among these models in laboratory experiments. Finally, we find that ambiguity seeking alpha-MEU agents may prevent the existence of market equilibrium. Our results indicate that ambiguity matters for portfolio choice and does not wash out in equilibrium.
Keywords: Ellsberg framework, alpha-maxmin expected utility model, ambiguity aversion, portfolio choice, market equilibrium
JEL Classification: G11, G12, C92, D53
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity
By Peter Klibanoff, Massimo Marinacci, ...
-
Model Misspecification and Under-Diversification
By Tan Wang and Raman Uppal
-
Model Misspecification and Under-Diversification
By Tan Wang and Raman Uppal
-
By Larry G. Epstein and Martin Schneider
-
Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation and Asset Prices
By H. Henry Cao, Harold H. Zhang, ...
-
Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns
By Nengjiu Ju and Jianjun Miao
-
Learning and Asset Prices Under Ambiguous Information
By Paolo Vanini, Markus Leippold, ...
-
By David Easley and Maureen O'hara
-
By Larry G. Epstein and Martin Schneider