Aboriginal Title in Canada: Site-Specific or Territorial?

Kent McNeil

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

July 1, 2013

This paper addresses the issue of Aboriginal title to land, and the relationship I see between Indigenous law and the common law in this context. In my understanding, there have been three judicial approaches to Aboriginal title: 1. A purely proprietary approach, based on occupation of land and the effect given to occupation by the common law (common law Aboriginal title). 2. An Indigenous law approach, whereby Aboriginal title arises from and is defined by pre-existing Indigenous law (Indigenous law title). 3. A territorial approach, whereby Aboriginal title is derived from both common law and Indigenous law and has governmental dimensions (territorial Aboriginal title). I am going to describe each of these, and then offer some critical comments on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard and the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s more recent decision in William v. British Columbia (the Tsilhqot'in Nation case).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: aboriginal, title, land, territory, indigenous, court, law

JEL Classification: K11

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 19, 2013  

Suggested Citation

McNeil, Kent, Aboriginal Title in Canada: Site-Specific or Territorial? (July 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2294552 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294552

Contact Information

Kent McNeil (Contact Author)
York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,013
Downloads: 312
Download Rank: 72,339